Below is an excerpt of an article, co-authored with Antitrust and Trade Regulation Team lawyer Jen Driscoll and Internal Investigations and Corporate Compliance chair Ed Heath, published in the American Health Law Association’s Health Law Weekly newsletter on January 19, 2024.

Mergers and acquisitions in health care markets are viewed with heightened scrutiny by

To ensure the continued availability of health care workers, on November 12, 2021, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (DPH) issued Order 2021-13 (COVID-19 Public Health Emergency Order No. 2021-13), extending licensure reciprocity for certain out-of-state providers to provide services (in person or via telemedicine) to patients in Massachusetts. Order 2021-13 extends prior DPH orders which authorized issuance of temporary licenses for certain health care providers and renewal or reactivation of certain temporary licenses.
Continue Reading Massachusetts DPH Issues Two Orders To Ensure Continued Availability of Health Care Provider Workforce

On June 11, 2019, the New York Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Andrew Carothers, M.D., P.C. v. Progressive Insurance Company, 2019 NY Slip Op 04643, holding that an insurer could withhold payments for medical services provided by professional corporations “when there is willful and material failure to abide by licensing and incorporation statutes” without a direct finding of fraud.  The court found that medical professional corporations (PCs) ceding too much control of management activities, including finances and operations, to a non-physician violates the Business Corporation law and the corporate practice of medicine doctrine, making the entity improperly incorporated, thus allowing an insurance company to withhold payment. While the scope of the Carothers case was limited to “no-fault” insurance reimbursement, this opinion is instructive on how New York courts may in the future examine the arrangements between PCs and management service organizations (MSOs).
Continue Reading New York Court of Appeals Holds that PCs that Cede Excessive Control to MSOs Violate the Corporate Practice of Medicine Doctrine